NSUN responds to the “social media ban” 

There is increasing debate about social media use and young people’s mental health. This has been spurred by a recent Conservative Party proposal to implement a blanket ban on social media for under 16s. The Government will run a consultation on young people and social media, including whether or not there should be a ban. The ban is inspired by similar proposals from many countries across the world, including an already-implemented ban in Australia.

At NSUN we welcome conversations about how social media companies, including their aggressive and addictive algorithms, exploit and harm young people. Big Tech must be responsible for the harms it profits from. There are far better ways of doing this than punishing young people.

We do not believe a blanket ban will achieve the effects it claims. This is hunch-based lawmaking, claiming to be acting for young people while simultaneously acting elsewhere to make their lives less liveable e.g. by slashing benefits, claiming worklessness, and weaponising the language of “overdiagnosis”. 

Tackling the youth mental health crisis will require complex and nuanced responses. It is only young people themselves who can tell us what that could look like. Rather than banning them from something potentially harmful, we need to centre young people in their own lives and needs. 

What is the social media ban?

  • The “social media ban” refers to banning under 16 year olds from certain social media platforms. Many are pointing to Australia, which recently implemented a similar ban. 
  • The ban is not yet law or in action. 
  • The ban was not the Government’s idea, instead, opposition MPs tried to add it to a piece of legislation currently being developed, called the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill
  • The Government said it will run its own consultation on young people and social media, including whether or not there should be a social media ban. It is not clear whether or how young people will be involved. 
  • If the Government does accept the amendment, it will then have one year to decide which platforms the ban should apply to. 

What is the ban on phones in schools? 

Along with many others accessing the mental health sector, we fear that a blanket ban puts young people more at risk, ignores lived realities and is misleading. Specifically, the ban:

This blanket ban is not rooted in the expertise or autonomy of young people. It is an ‘easy win’ policy that right-leaning MPs are using to try to regain public support. Labour MPs will jump on board, trying to ride the wave of popularity and save the current government. 

Young people deserve protection from Big Tech, and it is only young people who can tell us how to do that. No doubt they have been telling us for a while. If only the political system stopped using them as pawns, we might possibly be able to hear them.

Sources we trust on young people’s mental health and Big Tech